contestada

What is the basis of the argument that there is no such thing as ''realistic'' art? 
(A.) No one can no for sure what is real.
(B.) There are not enough paint colors available to create the full-color range we can see in real life.
(C.) All art is an imitation of reality and therefore cannot in itself be real.
(D.) No Artist has ever been talented enough to create something that looked realistic.

I want to say it's (C.) or (D.), but what do you think? 

Respuesta :

sbcardinals
(C.) All art is an imitation of reality and therefore cannot in itself be real. should be your answer.

There is a lot of art out there that looks realistic, so that is why (D.) is not the answer.
Your correct answer would be C

Hope this helps!

Otras preguntas