Respuesta :
Answer:
if on plato your answer should or talk about these concepts
Explanation:
Answers will vary but should include the following concepts:
The Supreme Court case Engel v. Vitale was heard in 1961 when some parents of students forced to recite daily prayers in school sued the New York school district.
The involved parents believed prayer in schools violated the First Amendment.
Majority opinion stated that public schools had no right to include official prayers, as it violated the Establishment Clause.
Dissenting opinion stated that allowing students to pray was in no way a violation of the Constitution. On the contrary, denying students the right to pray in school was unfair.
Conclude with your own thoughts on the matter.
According to the case of Engel v. Vitale the Supreme court announced a decision that government cannot frame the matter of prayers which are conducted in the assembly.
- In a government sponsored religious program the government drafted the prayer in accordance with the religion despite caring for constitutional laws associated with the prayers.
- The prayers were related to the constitution and one cannot modify the content of constitution in any written or oral matter by the virtue of religious promotion.
- The people who were in admiration of the religion were convinced with the change in the content of the constitution in their religioned language but it was not at all in favor of respect and admiration of constitution.
Hence, no government or any political party or any institution has the right to change the constitutional matter according once own will or benefit.
Learn more about constitution:
https://brainly.com/question/21352203