isabellalozano2
contestada

Putting it all Together: Argument From Evidence
The Law of Conservation of Matter states that matter can not be created, nor destroyed, it merely
changes forms. Your friend, Lisa, does not believe that the law of conservation is true because the
mass of the products is definitely less than the mass of the reactants in the campfire scenario.
Create an argument to support or refute Lisa's claim.
Include:
The initial claim, the evidence to support or refute the claim, and the scientific reasoning for
observed phenomena.
Address any counterclaims posed.
Identify the strengths and weaknesses of claims.
O

Respuesta :

Answer:

The reaction involved in a campfire (burning of wood) includes:

[tex]${{C}_{6}}{{H}_{12}}{{O}_{6}}+{{O}_{2}}\xrightarrow{\Delta }C{{O}_{2}}(g)+{{H}_{2}}O(g)+Energy+Ash$[/tex]

Explanation:

We can clearly find here that when wood burns in presence of oxygen, there is a loss of mass in the form of gaseous products. Thus, in this case, the law of conservation of mass does not come true.

I support Lisa’s statement but there is a fact associated with the law of conservation of mass. The law stands true only when there is a definite mass of the reactants and products mentioned.

Know more on:

https://brainly.com/question/11573747

Otras preguntas