Respuesta :
Answer:
Results from method B is more reliable than method A.
Explanation:
The two method that are used for the analysis produced different results. The first method that is method A gives higher value of the iodine content than the method B.
When [tex]$Mn^{2+}$[/tex] was added to water, method A showed an increased in the iodine content and it increases with the increase in the amount of [tex]$Mn^{2+}$[/tex] .
Where as in the method B, there is no change in the results. Therefore the measurements provided by the method A shows an inference of [tex]$Mn^{2+}$[/tex] ion.
The measurement of the iodine content is affected by the presence of the ion [tex]$Mn^{2+}$[/tex] in water.
Since in method B there is no change in measurement, it is independent of the presence [tex]$Mn^{2+}$[/tex] ion in water.
As higher iodine content is given by method A, so [tex]$Mn^{2+}$[/tex] ion must be present in original water that must be interfering the measurement. Hence, method B is more reliable.
Method B is more reliable as its value is not altered by external factors such as contamination.
What is water analysis?
Water analysis is done to test the quality of water.
The method employed in water analysis is titrimetric analysis.
In the test iodide (I⁻) content of a commercial mineral water using the two methods, the results of the test showed different values for the iodide content.
However, since addition of Mn²⁺ to the mineral water increases the iodide content value from Method A while that of Method B remains unchanged, Method B is more reliable as its value is not altered by external factors such as contamination.
Learn more about titrimetric analysis at: https://brainly.com/question/8463543
