Which BEST describes a result of the Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case?
A) A slave had the right to sue for freedom in a federal court.
B) A slave was only a citizen after he or she purchased freedom.
C) A slave was not a citizen but rather the property of an owner.
D) A slave who lived on free soil for any length of time was free.

Respuesta :

savsid
c) A slave was not a citizen but rather the property of an owner

The correct answer is C) A slave was not a citizen but rather the property of an owner.

The Dred Scott vs. Sandford case revolved around the claims of Dred Scott, a black man who was a slave. This man argued that he should be free, as his owner brought him into the Illnois territory were slavery was prohibited. Essentially, Scott argued that his living in this territory should make him free.

However, the Supreme Court ruled against Scott. The majority opinion discussed how slaves are property and that they have no rights in which white men need to respect. This controversial case caused a huge division in American society.