Answer:
No, I do not agree with him because not every aggression can be solved with military retaliation, force, or killing in self-defense.
Explanation:
John Locke has a theory of war in which he describes war as being a state of destruction which happens because someone pre-meditated taking another person's life. In his theory, he states that a person may kill another if his life is threatened, in self-defense.
He further argues that war is just and fair because it is a response to aggression and that the aggressor loses his or her rights when he puts people in a state of war and any means can be employed to defeat the enemy because war has no rules.
Answer:
I quite agree with Locke and disagree with him.
The theory of war according to John Locke is a state of destruction that brings about death of individuals and destruction of nations.
I agree with Locke that in a case whereby the life the citizens are threatened, then it's appropriate to use military force. An example is when the life of the citizens are threatened, using military force is appropriate.
Also, using military power isn't appropriate in a case whereby the citizens are engaging in free speech. There have been some cases whereby the citizens in a country will be engaging in peaceful protests and they get beaten by the military. This isn't appropriate.
In conclusion, depending on the situation, Locke's use of military power might either be appropriate or inappropriate.
