Rawls and Nozick both agree that ...


a) ... the law should embody no conception of the good life.
b) ... in the name of liberty, the government must provide basic necessities to those unable to procure them.
c) ... private institutions are not subject to principles of justice.
d) ... redistributive taxation is unjust unless it remedies some past injustice.
e) ... if the majority enacts it after sustained public debate, publicly funded healthcare is just.

Respuesta :

Answer:

A).  ... the law should embody no conception of a good life.

Explanation:

Rawls and Nozick both would agree with the claim that 'the law should embody no conception of a good life.' However, both of them gave contrasting opinions to share as Rawls was of the view that 'the wealth needs to redistributed in order to look after the less privileged' while Nozick considered it to be 'the violation of rich individual's liberty and called the government as Robinhood.' But they would agree that law must not personify the impression of a good life. Thus, option A is the correct answer.