Respuesta :
Answer:
In this case, the index of seawater replacement is 1.33, the index of refraction of air is 1, which is why the angle of replacement is less than the incident angle, so the fish seems to be closer
In the opposite case, when the fish looked at the face of the man, the angle of greater reason why it seems to be further away
Explanation:
This exercise can be analyzed with the law of refraction that establishes that a ray of light when passing from one medium to another with a different index makes it deviate from its path,
n₁ sin θ₁ = n₂ sin θ₂
where n₁ and n₂ are the refractive indices of the incident and refracted means and the angles are also for these two means.
In this case, the index of seawater replacement is 1.33, the index of refraction of air is 1, which is why the angle of replacement is less than the incident angle, so the fish seems to be closer
1 sin θ₁ = 1.33 sin θ₂
θ₂ = sin⁻¹ ( 1/1.33 sin θ₁)
In the opposite case, when the fish looked at the face of the man, the angle of greater reason why it seems to be further away
Answer:
The fish appears closer than it really is because light from the fish is refracted away from the normal as it enters the air pocket in the goggles. This is because air has a smaller index of refraction than water. The person will trace rays back to an image point in front of the actual fish. The fish will see the person's face exactly where it actually is because the light from the face is not refracted as it travels through water only, and does not change from one medium to another.
Explanation:
