Respuesta :
Answer:
Due to the higher coefficient of variation, 2009's GMAT scores show a more dispersed distribution
Step-by-step explanation:
To verify how dispersed a distribution is, we find it's coefficient of variation.
Coefficient of variation:
Mean of [tex]\mu[/tex], standard deviation of [tex]\sigma[/tex]. The coefficient is:
[tex]CV = \frac{\sigma}{\mu}[/tex]
Which year's GMAT scores show a more dispersed distribution
Whichever year has the highest coefficient.
2009:
Mean of 500, standard deviation of 90. So
[tex]CV = \frac{90}{500} = 0.18[/tex]
2010:
Mean of 570, standard deviation of 85.5. So
[tex]CV = \frac{85.5}{570} = 0.15[/tex]
Due to the higher coefficient of variation, 2009's GMAT scores show a more dispersed distribution
2009's GMAT scores show a more dispersed distribution.
Given that in 2009: Mean = 500 and standard deviation = 90.
In 2010: Mean = 570 and standard deviation = 85.5.
If the standard deviation is higher then the scores will be more dispersed.
Note that: 90 > 85.5. And 90 corresponds to 2009.
So, 2009's GMAT scores show a more dispersed distribution.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/11231804