contestada

1: Which statement below does NOT reflect why Monet’s painting was criticized?


a: The subject matter was of very little interest to his audience.



b: The brushstrokes tried to captured the momentary effects of wind and light.



c: The painting looked unfinished compared to accepted standards.



d: The audience was left with an impression of a scene rather than a detailed representation of reality.


2: How did Malevich’s economic circumstances differ from those of Monet’s?


a: Oil paint was more expensive and harder to come by in Tsarist Russia.



b: Russia’s ruling elite purchased Malevich’s paintings.



c: Monet could rely on wealthy, bourgeois patrons.



d: Monet’s France was poorer than Malevich’s Russia

Respuesta :

maddiemarie90
i think it’s either b or d!!
jayilych4real

Malevich’s economic circumstances differed from those of Monet’s because:

  • B: Russia’s ruling elite purchased Malevich’s paintings

According to the given question, we are asked to show how Malevich's economic circumstance was different from that of Monet, who were both painters.

As a result of this, we can see that Malevich's paintings had a slight edge over Monet's paintings because members of Russia's ruling elite purchased the paintings of Malevich.

Therefore, the correct answer is option B

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/21179303

Otras preguntas