missbriana11
contestada

Michael is a scientist who studies vegetation in the tundra. He lives in Russia and is looking at buying a house in the region
He lives on the permafrost and has two houses to choose from. One was built with a regular foundation, like any standard
house in the United States, and costs $5,000 less than the second house. The only difference he noticed was that the
second house was built on a gravel pad.
Based on the information provided, which house should Michael buy?

A. Michael should buy the first house.
B. Michael should buy the second house.
C. Either house would be a good investment for the region.
D. Neither house would be a good investment for the region.​

Respuesta :

Answer:

B. Michael should buy the second house.

Explanation:

It says it in the lecture.

Answer

(B) Michael should buy the second house.

Explanation:

This is because the first one is built on gravel so it's not that safe of a house since gravel sinks in and you should add the extract $5,000 to the house at least it's safe and would last longer then the house built on gravel.

Otras preguntas