Answer:
The answer is: This is an illustration of research coercion.
Explanation:
IRB committees state that a researcher must obtain consent from the human subjects to participate in the research, however, this consent must be obtained without coercion or inlfuence, participants must know that they have the right to choose whether or not to participate and they must have enough information about the research to make an informed decision.
Coercion occurs when the researcher threats, implicitly or overtly, the subjects in order for them to participate. In this case, the professor is using his position of power to force the students into participating in the research, which is why there is no consent.
This is an example of research coercion in action.
According to IRB committees, a research scientist must receive permission from human volunteers to participate in the study, but this consent must always be obtained without coercive power or influence.
Participants must understand that they have the entitlement can choose whether or not to play an active role, and they must have quite enough information regarding the research to make an informed choice.
https://brainly.com/question/13446891?referrer=searchResults
