Assume that January sales for the fourth year turn out to be $295,000. The decomposition method predicted sales of $298,424, while the multiple regression method forecasted sales of $286,736. Which interpretation best describes the forecast error for both methods?
The forecast error for the decomposition method was within ±3% but the multiple regression error was not within ±3%. Therefore, the decomposition method was better for this forecast.
The forecast error for the decomposition method was not within ±3% but the multiple regression error was within ±3%. Therefore, the multiple regression method was better for this forecast.
The forecast error for the decomposition method was not within ±3% and the multiple regression error was also not within ±3%. Therefore, both methods generated error high enough to be cautious about sales forecasts.
The forecast error for the decomposition method was within ±3% and the multiple regression error was also within ±3%. Therefore, both methods provide low error and similar forecast accuracy.

Question

03-12-2019
Mathematics

contestada

Assume that January sales for the fourth year turn out to be $295,000. The decomposition method predicted sales of $298,424, while the multiple regression method forecasted sales of $286,736. Which interpretation best describes the forecast error for both methods?
The forecast error for the decomposition method was within ±3% but the multiple regression error was not within ±3%. Therefore, the decomposition method was better for this forecast.
The forecast error for the decomposition method was not within ±3% but the multiple regression error was within ±3%. Therefore, the multiple regression method was better for this forecast.
The forecast error for the decomposition method was not within ±3% and the multiple regression error was also not within ±3%. Therefore, both methods generated error high enough to be cautious about sales forecasts.
The forecast error for the decomposition method was within ±3% and the multiple regression error was also within ±3%. Therefore, both methods provide low error and similar forecast accuracy.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Rashid and Tawana are watching the classic TV show Leave It to Beaver. After watching the show, they decide to play. Rashid says he will be Ward Cleaver and Taw

A marshy region used for agricultural drainage has become contaminated with a particular element. It has been determined that flushing the area with clean water

A plant can manufacture 50 golf clubs per day at a total daily cost of $4669 and 60 golf clubs per day for a total cost of $5269. (A) Assuming that daily cos

Tom viaja 60 millas por hora yendo a una ciudad vecina y 50 millas por hora regresando usando la misma carretera. condujo un total de 5 horas ida y vuelta cual

which equation is represented by the table?

what is an internt?

How to do long division for 2400 divided by 2.5.

An economist says that the probability is .47 that a randomly selected adult is in favor of keeping the Social Security system as it is, .32 that this adult is

Charmagne, a mid-level manager at Propel Marketing Services, dreads December when performance reviews are due. She believes that employees should just do what i

A traffic cop pulls over a speeder only to discover that the driver is a close friend. The police officer is torn because her professional obligations demand th

ajeigbeibraheem ajeigbeibraheem · Answer 1 · 2019-12-04T12:21:47+01:00

Answer:

The forecast error for the decomposition method was within ±3% and the multiple regression error was also within ±3%. Therefore, both methods provide low error and similar forecast accuracy.

Step-by-step explanation:

January sales for the fourth year as stated is $295,000.

While predicted sales of decomposition method and forecasted sales of multiple regression method were $298,424 and $286,736 respectively.

Our assumption is that for the accuracy to be valid, there is need for it needs to be within ±3% area of the actual results .

Therefore:

295000 × 0.03 = 8850

295000 + 8850 = 303850 ( expected predicted sales of decomposition by ±3%)

295000 - 8850 = 286150 (expected forecasted sales for multiple regression by ±3%)

We could see that both the results are within this ±3% area and decomposition was slightly more accurate. The forecast error for the decomposition method was within ±3% and the multiple regression error was also within ±3%. Therefore, both methods provide low error and similar forecast accuracy.

That's it!