Respuesta :
Answer:
Option A, Misunderstanding: The diet fad is safe. Reason: Technical jargon has been removed or simplified.
Explanation:
In this question, the scientist must have been allowed to explain the cause of "not being able to prove that diet fad causes heart attacks" instead of just answering "No, of course not." A hypothesis is a situational scenario which deals with "if" and "then" conditional scenarios.
Thus, if some thing has been found causing heart attack , then the scientist must have presented his/her supporting statement or technical jargon which was removed from the article and thus viewer were not able to get the exact meaning of what scientist said.
Hence, option A is correct
the other person was correct as i did the test and got it right!
misunderstanding: the diet fad is safe.
reason: technical jargon has been removed or simplified.