Respuesta :
Well we don't have the choices, maybe they're coming.
We want r(1)=2, r(2)=5, r(3)=8, ...
We can write that
[tex]r(n)=2 + 3(n-1)[/tex]
That's equivalent to
[tex]r(n)=3n-1[/tex]
Hopefully those are the two expressions among the choices. There are many equivalent expressions but these are the most likely.
We want r(1)=2, r(2)=5, r(3)=8, ...
We can write that
[tex]r(n)=2 + 3(n-1)[/tex]
That's equivalent to
[tex]r(n)=3n-1[/tex]
Hopefully those are the two expressions among the choices. There are many equivalent expressions but these are the most likely.
Answer:
r (1) = 2; r (n - 1) + 3, for n >_2
and
r (n) = 3n -1
Step-by-step explanation:
yall aint even give us the functions smh but its only two because r(1) is obv 2 and thats not expressed by any other answers. if u just plug it into the other functions (the ones without the first term) only one of the three work
grdingjersdvnjsjkbrhjzdfdfjdjk im screaminnggggg